Escaping Tutorial Hell
Why I’m Committing to 100 Days of Responsible AI
I have a folder on my laptop full of half-finished or undeployed projects.
There’s a chatbot that works 80% of the time. There’s a fraud detection script that runs perfectly in a Jupyter Notebook but has never seen a production server. There are countless "Hello World" implementations of the latest LLM frameworks.
For a long time, I thought this meant I was learning.
But recently, I hit a wall. I realized that while I can make AI work, I didn’t know how to make it matter.
If a CEO asked me, "Is this model safe to deploy to a million users?" I couldn't honestly answer "Yes." If an auditor asked, "Can you reproduce the exact decision this model made three months ago?" I would have to say "No."
That gap—the massive chasm between a working demo and a responsible, production-grade system—is what I am trying to cross.
I realized that the difference between a junior engineer and a leader isn’t just about knowing more syntax. It’s about responsibility.
A junior engineer celebrates when the code runs. A senior engineer worries about what happens when the data drifts, when the dependency updates, or when a bad actor tries to inject a prompt.
I started this blog series, 100 Days of Responsible AI Engineering, to force myself into that senior mindset.
"Responsible" sounds like a buzzword, but to me, it’s a technical constraint. It means building systems that are:
Reliable
They don't silently fail when the world changes.
Auditable
We know exactly why they did what they did.
Secure
They are hardened against attacks, not just bugs.
Ethical
They are designed with safety guards, not just accuracy metrics.
I am not writing this series as a guru on a mountaintop. I am writing it as an engineer in the trenches.
I am using this blog to simulate a high-stakes environment. For the next 100 days (or however long it takes me to do 100 posts), I am holding myself to a standard:
- No toy problems. If it works in a notebook but fails in a container, it’s a failure.
- No hand-waving. "It depends" is not an answer. I have to make a decision and defend the trade-offs.
- Auditability first. If I can't track it, I won't build it.
I’m writing this for myself, to solidify my own growth. But I’m also writing it for every other software engineer who feels the same Imposter Syndrome I do when looking at the complexity of modern MLOps.
I want to move beyond "copy-pasting tutorials" and start engineering systems that I would be proud to put my name on.
This is going to be hard. I’m going to struggle with tools I haven’t used before. I’m going to have to read boring documentation about compliance and governance.
But that’s the work.
Welcome to Day 000. Let’s build something real.